Comments on: The Stateless Man

By: Raman

Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:52:57 +0000

Having a debate with Rj is like banging your head against the wall….

]]>

By: RJ

Sun, 06 Sep 2015 05:40:36 +0000

You also seem to keep missing the point of this article: the debate is that he did have status, whether by mistake or not. Canada can not summarily take it away, especially because it is their mistake. The Canadian Civil Liberties Association seems to see this, but apparently you and your “open source” research is knows more than their lawyers. Again: even Bond will help you.

]]>

By: RJ

Sun, 06 Sep 2015 05:37:41 +0000

Not even the new government agrees with you. That’s why crimes punished with jail terms of less than six months do not lead to automatic deportations. This must be your open source research again. I suggest Bond. It’s a waffle of a law school that admits anyone with a pulse, but it could definitely help you.

]]>

By: RJ

Sun, 06 Sep 2015 05:36:14 +0000

All crimes cause a threat to the Canadian public; that is why it is in the Criminal Code. Indictable and summary crimes are not as distinct as you make it out to be. Simple theft under $5000 can be charged either summarily or indictably, even if it is for $1. It is up to the Crown, not to some defined definition of “serious”. So a person can now be deported for summary crimes too. This is the problem when you rely on open source information. I suggest you undertake some law studies. Even a yahoo “university” like Bond will give you a basic understanding of Canadian law. I would suggest you not undertake a career in research, or writing.

]]>

By: Raman

Sat, 05 Sep 2015 20:34:01 +0000

Their different types of crimes, it depends on severity of the crime. If it’s an indictable crime meaning more serious then yes the person is deport. If it’s something less serious which doesn’t cause a threat to the Canadian public then the person is not deported. Again this is all open source information.

]]>

By: Raman

Sat, 05 Sep 2015 20:29:43 +0000

Actually you deport people for committing crimes. Especially if they don’t have status in Canada.

]]>

By: RJ

Thu, 03 Sep 2015 06:44:22 +0000

You don’t deport somebody for merely committing a “crime”. Threatening to hit someone is a crime,as is murder. Do both deserve deportation? This is not the Middle Ages we are living in.

]]>

By: RJ

Thu, 03 Sep 2015 06:43:03 +0000

No he actually is stateless: India refuses to grant him any citizenship rights. He technically is not a Canadian citizen, but there is a compelling case that he is by virtue of Canada’s longstanding mistake. Canada cannot just dump one of its residents into a zone of statelessness because they want to. They are signatories to international protocols and treaties too.

]]>

By: Raman

Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:40:15 +0000

This guy is blaming all his own mistakes on the government. The fact is he was issued a Canadian passport by mistake and he’s not s Canadian citizen. He committed crimes and he should be punished for them. Why should we feel sorry for him? Because he is illegally here and he’s brown?

]]>

By: Rob

Wed, 02 Sep 2015 22:56:40 +0000

He’s not stateless. He has Indian citizenship.

Under Canadian law, children born in Canada of foreign representatives enjoying special status under the Foreign Missions and International Organizations Act (FMIOA) and covered by section 3(2) of the Citizenship Act do not acquire citizenship by virtue of their birth.

]]>